Absolute Beginner: BPM Clock + Sequencer + Waveform Meter Questions


#21

I got silenced by the forum temporarily as I exceeded the number of replies I’m allowed on my first day. :slight_smile:

Thanks for having me over here!

I downloaded the new library and started reading the docs PDF. Is there a way to install the library (replacing the current one that comes with Audulus) instead of opening them via the finder?

The signal types intro was indeed very helpful. :slight_smile: I will post some questions related to this in the Learn category.

As far as the waveform question: yes, I was asking why the peaks in the image I uploaded are not even. You are basically saying that the readout is inconsistent due to its rate while the signal peaks themselves are consistent? So if I record the output and open it in a DAW the peak would be uniform over time. I will try this.

I will come back to the sequencer business after I cover the fundamentals. Thanks for sharing the example!


#22

Thank you! In the example above the gate out from the sequencer is reseting the sine wave, so that it always starts at the 0 crossing and is going up from there?


#23

I went in an upped your user trust so that won’t happen again - it’s clear you’re going to be a valuable forum member! :slight_smile:

You can’t replace the library, but if you go to Audulus 3 in the menu bar and go to Open Modules Folder, you can place whatever you want in there and it will appear at the bottom of your right click menu.

Yes. What you’re seeing is the limitation of the measuring instrument. Imagine this:

x = where a sample of the incoming audio is taken and displayed on the waveform node
r = rising signal
f = falling signal

x--x--x-- Waveform Node Sampler
rrffrrffr Incoming Signal

result:

rrrffffff Waveform Node Display

So you can see how the output can become unreflective of the input - but over time it basically works fine for what it needs to be. In Audulus 4 we’ll have a more malleable scope that will allow you to change the window size. Right now it’s set to 5 seconds and you can’t change it - in the future you’ll be able to zero in on it closer so get more accurate picture of individual wavelets of audio.


#24

LOL… Thank you! I do like to understand things in detail. Well enough to explain them to other people.

Thank you! That works well for me.

Basically the input is higher resolution than the measuring instrument and the measurements are not taken at the exact same spots of the input signal (which itself is consistent)?

It’s funny that you bring this up… My next question was going to be if there is a way for me to modify the waveform meter module to zoom in on smaller portions of the input as snapshots and replace the current snapshot based on a timer. Ex. it produces a snapshot of 1 second of input every 5 seconds. [which gives me 5s to look at 1s, before I see the next one… obviously I would only be seeing 1/5 of the signal in this way… but presumably there could be a way to offset the location of the 1/5 interval, which is being rendered]

It sounds like you’ve already though through this problem and I can just wait for Audulus 4 to enjoy zooming in on smaller parts of the signal.


#25

This is a hack that kinda does something similar. Scope Demo.audulus (42.0 KB) It uses a S&H and phasor node to sample the input waveform periodically to drive the display. There are two variants, one takes a Hz or 1 per octave signal as a trigger and the other uses a zero crossing detector to set the sample rate. It works best on a fairly stable input waveform.


#26

Yep!

Yes, @stschoen showed the patch. It will accurately reproduce the waveform so long as you’re not modulating the waveform much - so FM won’t look correct on the scope, but a stable waveform will.